<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WhiteHouse.gov Is Not Social! But It Could Be&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://derekshowerman.com/2009/03/07/whitehousegov-is-not-social-but-it-could-be/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://derekshowerman.com/2009/03/07/whitehousegov-is-not-social-but-it-could-be/</link>
	<description>Social Media Best Practices, Analytics &#38; Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 05:02:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isaac Hazard</title>
		<link>http://derekshowerman.com/2009/03/07/whitehousegov-is-not-social-but-it-could-be/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Isaac Hazard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derekshowerman.com/?p=305#comment-90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes Yes Yes.

Either do this on Whitehouse.gov or create a sister site for the same.  I nominate www.MyAmerica.gov]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Yes Yes.</p>
<p>Either do this on Whitehouse.gov or create a sister site for the same.  I nominate <a href="http://www.MyAmerica.gov" rel="nofollow">http://www.MyAmerica.gov</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Showerman</title>
		<link>http://derekshowerman.com/2009/03/07/whitehousegov-is-not-social-but-it-could-be/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Showerman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 04:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derekshowerman.com/?p=305#comment-88</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A politicians &quot;brand,&quot; is something that is extremely refined and guarded, more so than any corporation or product.  Everything the President does is examined under a microscope. This is a world where even the questions at press conferences are pre-screened. Derek&#039;s analysis is great and truly democratic, however the politicians response would be,&quot;this makes me vulnerable to bad publicity and bad press coverage.&quot; How would you reassure a politician a true social network is going to be a positive attribute to their &quot;brand?&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A politicians &#8220;brand,&#8221; is something that is extremely refined and guarded, more so than any corporation or product.  Everything the President does is examined under a microscope. This is a world where even the questions at press conferences are pre-screened. Derek&#8217;s analysis is great and truly democratic, however the politicians response would be,&#8221;this makes me vulnerable to bad publicity and bad press coverage.&#8221; How would you reassure a politician a true social network is going to be a positive attribute to their &#8220;brand?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike P</title>
		<link>http://derekshowerman.com/2009/03/07/whitehousegov-is-not-social-but-it-could-be/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike P]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derekshowerman.com/?p=305#comment-87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice post and great ideas. I think that the concept here is crawl-before-you-walk, and walk-before-you-run. 
I would imagine everything being pre-moderated though, which would still hinder some aspects of the community. 
Eventually they will make additional strides, but it will take time, no doubt.
Mike P / @nhscooch]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post and great ideas. I think that the concept here is crawl-before-you-walk, and walk-before-you-run.<br />
I would imagine everything being pre-moderated though, which would still hinder some aspects of the community.<br />
Eventually they will make additional strides, but it will take time, no doubt.<br />
Mike P / @nhscooch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meredith Kench</title>
		<link>http://derekshowerman.com/2009/03/07/whitehousegov-is-not-social-but-it-could-be/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meredith Kench]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 02:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derekshowerman.com/?p=305#comment-86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Such great ideas Derek! 

I was so happy and impressed to see that whitehouse.gov on Obama&#039;s first day (the site was previously an embarrassment), but was saddened to see there was no commenting or other interactions I could take to communicate back to them. 

I really appreciate that Obama is trying to be more transparent and taking the government into the 21st century. I feel like he is the first president that truly &quot;gets&quot; who I am (or rather people like me - tech savvy folks). To me it would have been absurd to have a president that didn&#039;t know how to use the internet, or have a mobile phone - after all it is 2009!  

But I want him to take it further and really open up the dialogue between both sides. There&#039;s lots of smart people in this country that have something to say and don&#039;t have a voice right now. I am sure there will be the trolls who will also participate. But I do believe the community will police itself to a degree - not to mention moderation keeps that all running smoothly.

So yes - Great first step Obama... but don&#039;t stop there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Such great ideas Derek! </p>
<p>I was so happy and impressed to see that whitehouse.gov on Obama&#8217;s first day (the site was previously an embarrassment), but was saddened to see there was no commenting or other interactions I could take to communicate back to them. </p>
<p>I really appreciate that Obama is trying to be more transparent and taking the government into the 21st century. I feel like he is the first president that truly &#8220;gets&#8221; who I am (or rather people like me &#8211; tech savvy folks). To me it would have been absurd to have a president that didn&#8217;t know how to use the internet, or have a mobile phone &#8211; after all it is 2009!  </p>
<p>But I want him to take it further and really open up the dialogue between both sides. There&#8217;s lots of smart people in this country that have something to say and don&#8217;t have a voice right now. I am sure there will be the trolls who will also participate. But I do believe the community will police itself to a degree &#8211; not to mention moderation keeps that all running smoothly.</p>
<p>So yes &#8211; Great first step Obama&#8230; but don&#8217;t stop there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

